Monday, April 20, 2020
Heart Disease Prevention - Is Heart Disease The Only Cause Of Chest Pain?
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 9:57 PM 0 comments
Labels: angina, chest pain, heart attack, heart disease, stroke
Saturday, December 21, 2019
Heart Disease Prevention - Can Revascularization Outperform Drug For Ischemia?
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 5:34 PM 1 comments
Labels: angina, heart attack, heart disease, ischemia
Friday, December 22, 2017
Heart Disease Prevention - Can High Cholesterol Cause Heart Disease?
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 10:48 AM 0 comments
Labels: angina, atherosclerosis, cholesterol, HDL, heart attack, heart disease, LDL
Thursday, September 29, 2016
Heart Disease Prevention - Why Is Coronary Artery Disease Treated Differently Now?
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 12:51 AM 1 comments
Labels: angina, arrhythmias, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, heart attack, heart disease, heart failure
Thursday, April 01, 2010
Can Stop Smoking Really Save Life?
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 12:10 AM 2 comments
Labels: angina, cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart attack, heart disease, smoking, stroke
Sunday, November 30, 2008
How Effective Is Crestor In Preventing Heart Disease?
By lowering the bad cholesterol, it is possible to help prevent heart disease and hardening of arteries. These two conditions can develop heart attack, stroke, as well as vascular disease. Nevertheless, how effective is this medicine?
Presented during November 2008 at an annual meeting of the American Heart Association in New Orleans and published online by the New England Journal of Medicine, the study known as “JUPITER” revealed that Crestor could actually reduce by 44 percent the risk of heart problems among patients who currently do not face a high risk of getting a heart disease.
The study involved 17,802 men and women, of the age of 50 and more, who took 20 milligrams of Crestor on a daily basis. It was found that the combined risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes was reduced by 44 percent as compared with placebo among men and women with elevated hs-CRP but low to normal cholesterol levels.
By the way, CRP is a protein that is produced by the liver. It plays an important role in inflammatory processes and serves as a biological marker to measure the risk of artery blockage.
Also shown in the study, patients who took Crestor also had the combined risk of heart attack, stroke or death from heart disease reduced by 47 percent. Meanwhile, their risk of heart attack was cut by more than half, the risk of stroke was reduced by nearly half and the total mortality of the participants was lowered by 20 percent.
It was also recorded in the study that a daily dose of 20 milligrams of Crestor was well tolerated in nearly 9,000 patients during the course of the trial, and there was no difference between treatment groups for major adverse events, including cancer or myopathy.
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 10:13 PM 0 comments
Labels: angina, arterial revascularization, bad cholesterol, Crestor, CRP, good cholesterol, HDL, heart attack, heart disease, JUPITER, LDL, myocardial infarction, stroke, triglycerides, vascular disease
Monday, November 24, 2008
Can Electrocardiogram Predict Heart Disease?
People usually regard electrocardiogram (or better known as ECG or EKG) as one that is given only to patients who are having attack of angina. It is estimated that about 1 in 50 people in Britain experience angina.
A paper published on November 14, 2008 in the British Medical Journal indicated that a routine examination by a doctor works almost as well as ECG in predicting heart disease.
During the ECG test, electrodes are placed on a patient’s skin and the electrical activity of the heart is recorded over time so that abnormal rhythms could be detected. Although ECG has been shown to be effective in revealing damage, its ability in predicting future heart disease was unknown.
As such, a team of researchers at the London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry carried out a study that examined 8,176 patients with suspected angina but with no prior history of heart disease.
A standard clinical assessment, which looked at criteria including age, sex, ethnicity, duration of symptoms, description of chest pain, smoking status, and history of hypertension (high blood pressure) and medicines, was carried out on all the patients.
ECG was given to all the patients while they were at rest, and some 60 percent of them were arranged to have an exercise ECG that was performed while they were in motion. All the patients were monitored during the following year.
The researchers found that half of all heart incidents, which occurred during that period, happened in patients whose ECG tests had not shown any indication of heart disease. Meanwhile, they also found that a routine clinical assessment was almost as good an indicator of future heart problems.
Such findings might highlight the importance of taking a detailed medical history and making a thorough physical examination. ECG might be helpful for some patients by the additional information it provides, but it is a pity that it does not predict heart disease risk for everyone.
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 10:00 PM 0 comments
Labels: angina, coronary artery disease, ECG, electrocardiogram, heart disease, high blood pressure, hypertension, smoking
Sunday, October 05, 2008
Which is Superior, Angioplasty or Bypass?
Coronary Angioplasty (or angioplasty, in short) is a technique to treat coronary heart disease and angina. It involves opening narrowed or blocked blood vessels known as coronary arteries of the heart.
Angina is chest pain or discomfort that occurs when an area of the heart muscle does not get enough oxygen-rich blood. A person with angina may feel pressure or squeezing in the chest. The pain may also occur in the shoulders, arms, neck, jaw, or back.
While angioplasty is a procedure, coronary artery bypass grafting (in short, bypass) is a type of heart surgery. It is sometimes called CABG ("cabbage"). During the operation, the surgery reroutes, or "bypasses," blood around clogged arteries by using a segment of a healthy blood vessel from another part of the body to improve blood flow and oxygen to the heart.
In October 2007, a new study revealed that bypass is indeed better than angioplasty at relieving chest pain and preventing the need for a repeat procedure. On the other hand, both angioplasty and bypass could provide patients with heart disease who need a procedure or surgery to clear their clogged coronary arteries the similar 10-year survival rates.
1.2 percent of patients undergoing bypass and 0.6 percent of those being treated with angioplasty incurred strokes. Angina was relieved over a 5-year period in 84 percent of bypass patients comparing with 79 percent of the angioplasty group.
Meanwhile, the researchers also found that 43 percent of patients treated with angioplasty and less than 10 percent of patient undergone coronary bypass required repeat procedures after 5 years.
Nevertheless, as noted by the researchers, emergence of new and refined techniques has made such a comparison to “remain a moving target”. In fact, new studies have already begun to investigate how the availability of drug-coated stents used in angioplasty affects the comparative efficacy of these techniques.
Posted by Ng Peng Hock at 11:20 PM 0 comments
Labels: angina, angioplasty, bypass, chest pain, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart disease, stroke
